Survey on Experts' Joint Statements in International Arbitration

Survey image

Thank you for agreeing to take this survey. Please find below a brief questionnaire relating to experts' joint statements on which we would be grateful if you could provide your views.

1.

Have you had experience working on experts' joint statements in international arbitrations?

2.

Do you think it would be useful to have a prescribed protocol or guidance on producing experts' joint statements (similar, for instance, to the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators Protocol for the Use of Party-Appointed Expert Witnesses)?

If yes, please go to Question 3. If no, please go to Question 4.

3.

If yes, please describe what issues you think such protocol or guidance should cover/ include:

4.

If no, please explain why not.

5.

In particular, do you think that lawyers should have a role in:

Yes No
(a) attending the experts' joint meetings or discussions
(b) reviewing and commenting on drafts of the experts' joint statements

In that regard, you may wish to refer to the article at https://www.scl.org.sg/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=640 regarding the role that lawyers should play in the production of experts' joint statements.

6.

If so, what safeguards (if any) should there be to ensure the independence of the experts in producing their joint statement?

7.

Finally, are there any specific principles or guidance that would be helpful for experts in the following disciplines: delay & disruption, quantum and technical?




8.

Please provide us with your brief contact details below. These will be kept confidential, and your answers will not be attributed to you. Providing your details will allow us to contact you to clarify any of your answers if necessary.




1/1

Powered by Survs